Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and actionable with a concrete code pattern and named API surface. The main gap is workflow clarity: it offers guardrails rather than an explicit, sequenced process with a verification step.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow for the common case (e.g., 1. check examples/ for native syntax, 2. call the API surface, 3. compile/run to verify), with an explicit validation step so generated code is checked.
Reconcile the naming inconsistency between the core pattern ("ax.NewAx") and the API surface ("axllm.NewAx") so the example is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean fact-lists and a single code pattern with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete Go core pattern plus a named API surface ("axllm.NewAx", "axllm.Fn", "axllm.AxMCPClient") and directive guardrails, giving specific executable guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is an implied approach (start from examples, use the API surface, follow guardrails) but no explicit sequenced workflow or validation checkpoint, matching the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-organized overview with clear sections that points to detailed material at one level deep ("Package API docs: API.md and axir-api.json", "Runnable examples: examples/"), matching the clear-overview-with-signaled-references anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |