Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and pattern-rich with executable Go snippets, but it is undercut by an inconsistent API-surface listing, the absence of any sequenced workflow with validation, and references to bundle files that are not actually provided.
Suggestions
Reconcile the API surface with the import alias: use ax.-prefixed symbols (e.g. ax.NewSignature, ax.AxSignature) and demonstrate axllm.S/axllm.Fn/axllm.Tool in an example or drop them.
Add a short end-to-end workflow (declare signature → render schema → attach to AxGen → forward) with a validation/compile check step before proceeding.
Either bundle the referenced files (API.md, axir-api.json, axir-capabilities.json, examples/) or reword the references so the skill is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and code-forward, with one-line rationales per pattern and no explanation of Go or library concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete Go examples are present, but the "Relevant API Surface" lists axllm.S, axllm.Fn, and axllm.Tool with an axllm. prefix that contradicts the ax import alias and is never demonstrated in any example, leaving key details incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Patterns and guardrails are listed and a loose "start from examples, then browse the gallery" order exists, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow or validation checkpoint for the generation flow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and references (API.md, axir-api.json, axir-capabilities.json, examples/) are signaled, but no bundle files exist, so the referenced detailed materials are absent and the disclosure promise is unfulfilled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |