Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized reference skill with concrete code and clearly signaled package-doc references. The only gap is workflow clarity: it is a reference rather than a sequenced process, so it lacks explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow for the common case (e.g. consult examples/ -> match API surface -> write call -> verify against API.md) with an explicit validation step to lift workflow_clarity.
Define the `llm` variable in the Core Pattern snippet (or note where it comes from) so the example is fully self-contained and copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: terse fact bullets, a one-sentence intro, a minimal code snippet, and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, real-API Java code example ('Ax.agent(...)', 'helper.forward(...)') plus specific file references (API.md, axir-api.json, examples/) and named API surface, giving copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are well organized and the Guardrails offer soft ordering ('Start from package examples ... before inventing a new call shape'), but there is no explicit multi-step sequence with validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview split into clear sections and points one level deep to package artifacts (API.md, axir-capabilities.json, examples/) that are clearly signaled, giving easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |