Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable instruction body: every step names an exact path or command, ordering constraints are explicit, and validation is a concrete command checklist. The only notable gaps are the absence of a worked example for the 'ax-example' header and 'site-map.json' formats, and no error-recovery loop when checks fail.
Suggestions
Add a minimal worked example of an 'ax-example' header and one 'site-map.json' entry so the 'before updating generated markdown' step is fully executable without guessing the formats.
Close the validation loop: after the Checks block, add a short 'if a check fails' step (fix the source template/language JSON rather than generated output, then re-run the failed check) so error recovery is explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is entirely terse imperatives with exact paths and commands — 'Inspect current repo truth first', 'Update common prose once in website/content-src/templates/', the one-line Hugo PATH note — with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is executable: concrete commands ('npm run example -- list', 'npm run axir:generate-packages'), exact file paths, enumerated snippet metadata fields, and a copy-paste nine-command Checks block. It falls short of anchor 5 only because two things the workflow hinges on — the shape of an 'ax-example' header and a 'site-map.json' entry — are named but never exemplified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1–6 workflow with explicit ordering constraints ('Inspect current repo truth first', 'before updating generated markdown') and a validation checklist of exact commands, matching anchor 4. It misses anchor 5 because there is no fix-and-rerun feedback loop telling Claude what to do when a check such as 'website:check' or 'test:examples:generated' fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a compact (~53-line) body with no bundle files and no content that belongs in external references, organized into four well-labeled sections (Workflow, Feature/Language/Example Sync, API Mapping, Checks); per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, this earns the top anchor on section organization alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |