Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body with concrete paths, commands, and a clear validation checklist. The only gap is an implicit rather than explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop for the batch regeneration steps.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Checks section (e.g., 'If website:check or axir:check-packages fails, fix the offending source and re-run website:prepare before re-checking').
State the ordering invariant between validation and regeneration explicitly (e.g., 'regenerate only after the catalog validates') to harden the batch workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout — tight bullet lists, concrete paths and commands, and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries actionable information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives fully executable guidance: exact paths (website/content-src/languages/<language>.json), specific npm commands (npm run axir:generate-packages, npm run website:prepare), named header fields (title, group, provider, env, level), and a copy-paste Checks block. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation (validate the catalog, website:check, git diff --check) and a recovery note for missing Hugo, but the validate→fix→retry feedback loop is only implied rather than spelled out for the main checks. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Workflow, Feature/Language/Example Sync, API Mapping, Checks), meeting the simple-skill exception for full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |