Conciseness

The body is efficient and imperative throughout, with Bad/Good pairs that earn their tokens, but the "What ADHD changes about reading" section spends ~10 lines restating broadly known traits (working memory is small, starting is hard, dopamine matters) that could be trimmed to one line each. This fits the anchor for efficient content with minor instances of over-explanation, not 5, because that section assumes less of Claude's existing knowledge than the rest of the file does.

Actionability

Every rule carries concrete, executable guidance: real commands and paths ("Edit `src/auth.ts:42`", "npm test -- auth.spec.ts", "Test fails at `auth.spec.ts:42`: expected 200, got 401"), paired Bad/Good examples, and a literal pre-send deletion checklist. For an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable and copy-paste ready, matching the top anchor; nothing is abstract or described-only.

Workflow Clarity

The application sequence is unambiguous: rules (with ranked exceptions in "When to break the rules") followed by an explicit validation checkpoint — the pre-send check ending in "if the reader reads only the first line and the last line, do they know (a) what to do next, and (b) what just happened? If yes, send." As a single-purpose style skill with an explicit verify step and an override hierarchy, it meets the simple-skill top anchor; it is not a 4 because no checkpoint is missing or merely implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single self-contained file with clear, well-ordered sections and no references (none exist, none are cited, so nothing is broken or buried), and nothing clearly belongs in a separate file. It sits at 4 rather than 5 because the ~130-line body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case where organization alone earns the top score, and the rule-by-rule examples could, if it grew, be the first candidates for splitting out.

Specificity

The description lists six concrete actions — "lead with the next action, number multi-step work, restate state across turns, suppress tangents, give specific time estimates, make wins visible" — comprehensively covering the skill's shaping behaviors, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage. It is not a 4 because the coverage of the skill's behaviors is essentially complete rather than having minor gaps; each clause is a directive, not generic filler.

Completeness

Both "what" (shape output with six named behaviors) and "when" ("Invoke with /i-have-adhd; stays on until 'stop adhd mode'") are explicitly answered with a concrete trigger phrase and exit condition. Not a 4 because the trigger guidance is fully explicit rather than only present-but-imprecise; the explicit-invocation design makes the slash command the correct and complete trigger statement.

Trigger Term Quality

The core natural keyword a user would say is present ("ADHD"), and the invocation phrase "/i-have-adhd" is concrete, but there are no synonym phrases users might naturally use such as "distracted", "can't focus", or "attention span". This fits the anchor for good keyword coverage with a few natural terms missing, not 5, since coverage is not comprehensive across natural variations.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Shape output for a reader with ADHD" names a clear niche with a distinct, single trigger (the /i-have-adhd slash command) and an explicit off-switch, so conflict with other skills is minimal. It is not a 4 because no closely related skill would plausibly collide with this specific audience-scoped trigger.