Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable, well-structured single-purpose skill with copy-paste commands and clear outcome handling. The only minor gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints, which are not strictly necessary for this non-destructive annotation workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (the approve-button caveat, the --json clarification) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands for both the ordinary and --gate --json cases, covering the common scenarios. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Behavior list gives a clear sequence with outcome branching and an error-recovery loop (step 6 re-runs on unresolved args), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints; acceptable for this non-destructive task, hence just above midpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references or bundle files needed; content is well-organized with clear headers, code blocks, and a numbered list, which qualifies for 5 per the simple-skills guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |