Conciseness

Lean and efficient with no concept over-explanation; every line instructs an action and it assumes Claude's competence, matching the 5 anchor.

Actionability

Provides a concrete executable command (plannotator annotate <path-or-url>) with copy-ready handling for returned annotations, approved-with-notes, and unresolvable-argument recovery, covering the common and edge cases.

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequence with error-recovery feedback (re-run with a concrete path when args cannot be resolved), but the wait/verification checkpoints are slightly implicit rather than explicit validation steps.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single purpose, no external references or bundle files, and well-organized into a heading, command block, and numbered list — qualifying for 5 under the simple-skill exception.

Specificity

Names two concrete actions ("Open Plannotator's annotation UI", "respond to the returned annotations") alongside a comprehensive enumeration of target types, fitting above the 3 anchor but short of the multiple-action 5 anchor.

Completeness

The "what" is explicit, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance in the description, so the "when" is only weakly implied — capping completeness at 3 per the judging guideline.

Trigger Term Quality

Strong keyword coverage across file types and extensions (.yaml, .json, .toml, .ini, .csv, .log, HTML, URL, folder), but it omits the most natural user phrasing ("annotate") that appears only in the body.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a named tool (Plannotator) with a specific UI and command, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.