Conciseness

The body is lean: it gives the executable command and a short workflow with no concept explanation (e.g., it never explains what Plannotator is), assuming Claude's competence, so every token earns its place.

Actionability

It provides the concrete, copy-paste-ready command `plannotator last` in a code block plus explicit behavior steps, matching the anchor for fully executable commands.

Workflow Clarity

The numbered Behavior steps (launch, wait, branch on feedback vs. no feedback, continue) form a clear sequence with explicit conditional handling; this is a simple, non-destructive task so the validation cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

This is a sub-50-line skill with no external references and no bundle files; it is organized into clear sections (title, Run, Behavior), which per the rubric's simple-skills note earns a 3 without separate files.

Specificity

"Open Plannotator on the latest rendered assistant message" and "use the returned annotations to revise that message or continue" name multiple concrete actions, matching the anchor that lists several specific actions.

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the rubric completeness caps at 2 with the "when" only implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "annotations" and "revise" are relevant, but the phrasing is tool-internal and offers only one expression of the trigger, missing common user variations a natural request would use.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named tool "Plannotator" and the specific "latest rendered assistant message" target define a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills.