Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable CLI skill: a copy-paste-ready command, a concrete stacked-branch example, and a clear sequenced workflow with outcome branching. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery checkpoint if the command itself fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what code review or Plannotator is, and every line (the command, the stacked-branch note, the behavioral steps) earns its place. This matches anchor 5 (lean and efficient; every token earns its place). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready command 'plannotator review [--base <ref>] [--diff-type <type>] [optional-pr-url]' plus a concrete worked scenario for stacked branches ('Pass --base <the branch immediately below yours>'). This matches anchor 5 (fully executable, copy-paste ready, covers common cases). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Behavior list gives a clear four-step sequence with outcome-based branching (handle feedback vs. acknowledge approval), which is a feedback loop. It stops short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoint (e.g., what to do if the command itself fails). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill (well under 50 lines) with no need for external references, and it is organized into clear sections (intro, Run, Behavior). Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, that qualifies for anchor 5 with well-organized sections and no bundle files to misplace. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |