Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, highly actionable five-phase workflow with concrete commands, complete JSON schemas, and explicit validation checkpoints; its main weakness is minor redundancy in the fact-sheet definition prose.
Suggestions
Tighten the Phase 3 fact definition to a single sentence (e.g., "A fact is a simple, testable, verifiable description of one outcome of the goal.") and drop the repeated "A fact may... Again, a fact is..." restatements.
Consider collapsing the grilling-protocol preamble and blockquote into a concise opt-in pointer to reduce token weight on an optional path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most of the body is lean concrete commands and JSON schemas, but the Phase 3 "A fact is... A fact may... Again, a fact is literally anything..." paragraph restates the same idea redundantly and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact executable commands (e.g., "plannotator setup-goal interview goals/<slug>/interview.json --json", "plannotator annotate goals/<slug>/plan.md --gate") and complete JSON schemas with field names and answerMode values, copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly numbered phases with explicit validation checkpoints ("Wait for the user to confirm or correct before continuing", "Write that exact result... before continuing") and a --gate feedback loop ("revise from feedback and re-gate until approved"). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the body is organized into clear, navigable phase sections with no nested references and nothing that needs splitting into separate files for this sequential workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |