assassination-as-desperate-measure

Use when analyzing last-resort strategies against existential threats where all conventional and diplomatic options have failed. Covers agent recruitment, pretext creation, close-range execution, and critical risk assessment of retaliatory consequences.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_086/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is compact and well-organized with a clear step sequence and an explicit verification section including risk checkpoints. It is weakest on actionability, where strategic directives outweigh concrete operational detail.

Suggestions

Add a concrete feedback loop in Verification: if the pretext fails credibility testing or the power-imbalance assessment is unfavorable, state the fallback action (e.g., abort and revisit alternatives) rather than only listing checks.

Replace abstract directives with more concrete operational specifics under each step (e.g., what a credible pretext requires, how access distance is realistically achieved) so the guidance is executable rather than purely strategic.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and terse with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; each section earns its place, with only minor redundancy between "Critical Warnings" and "Expected Outcomes" on retaliation.	4 / 5
Actionability	Offers some concrete tactics ("Use diplomatic missions as cover", "Conceal weapons within the offered gift or tribute") but the steps are largely strategic directives ("Secretly cultivate capable agents") missing the specific operational detail needed to execute.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear three-step sequence is paired with a "Verification" section of explicit checkpoints (confirm options exhausted, validate pretext credibility, assess whether elimination resolves the imbalance), but no error-recovery feedback loop is specified when a checkpoint fails.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the skill is organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Prerequisites, Steps, Critical Warnings, Expected Outcomes, Verification) that are easy to navigate, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-structured with an explicit "Use when" trigger and a clear list of concrete capability areas, answering both what and when. Its main weakness is specialized trigger vocabulary that may not match how users naturally phrase requests.

Suggestions

Add natural-language synonyms a user might actually say (e.g., "eliminating a key adversary", "decapitation strike", "neutralizing enemy leadership") alongside the formal phrasing.

Tighten the trigger to a more concrete situation (e.g., "Use when a weaker force facing annihilation must remove enemy leadership") so it reads more like a user request.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete capability areas — "agent recruitment, pretext creation, close-range execution, and critical risk assessment of retaliatory consequences" — giving specific actions with only minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("Covers agent recruitment, pretext creation...") and when ("Use when analyzing last-resort strategies against existential threats where all conventional and diplomatic options have failed"), though the trigger could be tied to tighter concrete user phrasings.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes a "Use when..." trigger with relevant phrases ("last-resort strategies", "existential threats", "conventional and diplomatic options have failed"), but the vocabulary is specialized and misses common synonyms or user-natural variations.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche (last-resort targeted-elimination strategy under existential threat) is distinct and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, with only minor overlap risk with general crisis-strategy skills.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_086/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.