Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-sequenced, and includes explicit validation, making it a solidly structured analytical workflow. Its main gap is actionability: it tells Claude what factors to consider but not how to weigh them or apply them via a worked example.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example (e.g., a brief side-by-side comparison of two states with the intangible factor that decided the outcome) to convert the factor checklists into a concrete, repeatable procedure.
Provide a lightweight decision rule or weighting heuristic for resolving discrepancies (e.g., 'when material and intangible factors conflict, weight governance quality and popular support most heavily') so the analysis is reproducible rather than open-ended.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout — a one-line overview, tight bulleted factor lists, and a compact validation section with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — fitting the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than the unnecessary-explanation anchor at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete factors to examine (e.g., 'Territory size', 'Population/military numbers', 'application of benevolence (仁义)') but stops at checklists with no worked example, concrete analytical procedure, or decision rule for how to weigh factors, fitting the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than fully actionable guidance at 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | It lays out a clear four-step sequence (Material → Leadership → Identify Discrepancies → Root Cause) and closes with an explicit Validation section containing three verification checks, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor; not 2 because checkpoints are present rather than merely implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a sub-50-line single-purpose analytical skill with no need for external references, and its sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Validation) are well-organized, so per the simple-skills scoring note progressive disclosure scores 3 without separate reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |