Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized with a clear progressive sequence and explicit validation checkpoints, and it appropriately avoids external references for a short simple skill. Its weakness is actionability: the core frameworks are described/defined rather than turned into concrete curriculum-design steps, and a few lines are mildly redundant.
Suggestions
Turn the four teachings and four eliminations from definitions into concrete design steps (e.g., 'For each lesson, select a 文 text, pair it with a 行 practice task, and assess via 忠 and 信 criteria').
Trim the generic "Expected Outcomes" padding (e.g., 'Learning is internalized through struggle and discovery') to keep every line actionable.
Add a short worked example of a single lesson or unit that applies all four frameworks end-to-end so the method is copy-paste usable rather than descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with terse bilingual lists, but the lead sentence ("A comprehensive approach to teaching moral philosophy...") and "Expected Outcomes" add generic philosophical padding ("Learning is internalized through struggle and discovery") that could be tightened. Not a 1 because it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; not a 3 because some lines don't earn their tokens. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, testable guidance appears in Validation ("Test whether students can infer three corners", "Verify that learners demonstrate the four eliminations"), but the four teachings and eliminations are presented as definitions/descriptions rather than executable curriculum-design steps. As an instruction-only skill it has some concrete guidance but key details for actually building a curriculum are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The progressive-mastery sequence (melody → technique → intent → character) is clearly ordered, and the Validation section provides explicit checkpoints with a feedback loop ("if not, revisit foundational instruction before advancing"). For a simple, non-destructive skill this meets the well-organized threshold; not below 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; content is cleanly organized into distinct sections (Four Teachings, Four Eliminations, Teaching Principles, Expected Outcomes, Validation). Per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections earn a 3 without external file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |