coordinated-multi-front-military-campaign

Use when organizing coordinated attacks from multiple departure points against a common enemy. Assigns commanders (大将军, 车骑将军, etc.) to independent columns that report results separately for performance-based rewards.

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, well-structured, and includes explicit verification checkpoints for a batch/coordinated operation, scoring highly across all dimensions. The only slight gap is actionability, where procedural instruction could be made more mechanically explicit.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	A lean procedural skill with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (departure points, force sizes, commander titles) carries operational weight.	5 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, specific guidance (10,000 cavalry per column, named general titles, named routes) rather than vague direction, but it is procedural instruction without copy-paste-ready code or a mechanism for the reporting/evaluation mechanics.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence supported by a dedicated Verification section with explicit checkpoints (departure point/route/commander assigned, hierarchy established, results compiled independently), satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Key Principles, Expected Outcome, Verification), meeting the simple-skill exception for a clean self-contained structure.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Description

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete actions and a distinct niche. Its main weakness is trigger-term breadth, leaning on specialized military vocabulary rather than widely used synonyms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions ('Assigns commanders... to independent columns', 'report results separately', 'performance-based rewards') with minor gaps in coverage such as objective planning and force sizing.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Assigns commanders... to independent columns that report results separately') and when ('Use when organizing coordinated attacks...') with concrete trigger phrasing.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains a natural trigger phrase ('organizing coordinated attacks from multiple departure points against a common enemy') but relies on niche Han-dynasty vocabulary and misses common synonyms or variations a general user might say.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear, narrow niche (coordinated multi-front campaigns with named Han commander titles) with minimal overlap risk against other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_221/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 15 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.