CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

counter-intelligence-removal-tactic

Use when an effective enemy commander has political vulnerabilities exploitable through disinformation. Plants rumors of rebellion or disloyalty to trigger the commander's replacement by a less competent successor.

64

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Well-structured, concise, and actionable instruction-only skill with a clear step sequence and validation checkpoints. Minor tightening and an explicit fix-retry loop in verification would lift it to top marks.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body that assumes competence and avoids explaining background concepts; only minor restatement (the opening line rephrases the description) keeps it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific steps with example rumor templates and real-circumstance references ('only two cities remain unconquered, why the delay?'), plus a historical example; minor gaps (no operational detail on dissemination channels) hold it at 4.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step sequence is paired with a dedicated Verification section containing pre-action validation checkpoints, but the validation is confirmatory rather than a tight fix-and-retry feedback loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Prerequisites, Steps, Historical Example, Expected Outcomes, Verification) and no need for external references, matching the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and clear statement of capability. Its main weakness is trigger-term phrasing that reads more as analysis than natural user language, and slightly limited action coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (disinformation against enemy commanders) and two concrete actions ('Plants rumors of rebellion or disloyalty' and 'trigger the commander's replacement'), but coverage is not comprehensive enough to reach 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (plants rumors to trigger replacement by a less competent successor) and when ('Use when an effective enemy commander has political vulnerabilities exploitable through disinformation') with concrete trigger phrasing.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Has an explicit 'Use when an effective enemy commander has political vulnerabilities...' clause, but the phrasing is specialized rather than the natural synonyms a user would say, missing common variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (commander removal via political disinformation) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.