CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

earth-collapse-stability-analysis

Use when assessing regime stability by distinguishing 土崩 (popular uprising from mass discontent) versus 瓦解 (elite rebellion with military resources). Prioritizes popular sentiment analysis over elite threat management.

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, concise analytical framework with concrete diagnostic questions, clear decision logic, and a verification checklist. It falls just short of top marks on actionability and workflow clarity by lacking a worked example and interleaved validation gating.

Suggestions

Add a brief worked example applying the 土崩/瓦解 framework to one concrete historical or hypothetical regime to lift actionability from instructive to demonstrably executable.

Promote the Verification checks into interleaved gating checkpoints (e.g., 'Only proceed to elite assessment once popular-sentiment indicators are confirmed') to turn terminal verification into a true feedback loop.

Trim the redundant Overview sentence since the title and Key Distinction section already convey the same framing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and uses tight bullet structure with inline translations that earn their place, but the Overview line restates the title/Key-Distinction framing, a minor redundancy that keeps it just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only skill — diagnostic questions ('Are people economically secure?'), clear if-then risk classification, and matched responses — but lacks a worked example applying the framework to a concrete scenario, a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced four-step analysis flow is paired with an explicit Verification checklist, but the validation is terminal (run after all steps) rather than interleaved gating checkpoints as in the anchor-5 example, placing it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a self-contained analytical framework with no need for external references, and is organized into clean, well-labeled sections (Overview, Key Distinction, Analysis Steps, Key Insight, Verification), satisfying the simple-skills allowance for a 5 on structure alone.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is explicit, well-triggered, and highly distinctive, cleanly answering both what the skill does and when to use it. Its only limitation is that it names just one or two concrete actions rather than a comprehensive list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (regime stability) and two concrete analytical actions ('distinguishing 土崩 versus 瓦解' and 'Prioritizes popular sentiment analysis'), but does not list several specific actions, matching the 1-2-concrete-actions anchor rather than the 'several specific actions' anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (distinguishing 土崩 vs 瓦解, prioritizing popular sentiment analysis) and 'when' ('Use when assessing regime stability') with a concrete trigger clause, satisfying the anchor for a clear what-and-when with explicit trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage including natural trigger phrase 'Use when assessing regime stability' plus '土崩', '瓦解', 'popular uprising', 'mass discontent', 'elite rebellion', and 'elite threat management', though a few synonymous phrasings users might naturally say are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A highly niche analytical framework keyed on the specific 土崩/瓦解 distinction with clear triggers, giving it a distinct niche and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.