Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured procedural skill with a clear sequence and explicit validation checkpoints. The main gap is actionability: steps describe what to do but not the specifics needed to execute consolidation and appointment.
Suggestions
Add concrete execution criteria to step 3 (e.g. target population/boundary size for merging settlements) and step 4 (e.g. selection criteria or reporting cadence for the appointed administrator 令).
Turn the "Examples from Practice" into a short template a user could mirror (e.g. a one-line per-county record format) rather than only historical facts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: short bullet steps and brief section intros with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete actions ("Assign one administrator (令) per county", "Apply uniform laws and regulations") but omit execution detail — no thresholds for settlement consolidation, boundary criteria, or appointment qualifications — leaving the guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly numbered and the dedicated Validation section provides explicit checkpoints ("Verify that each new county has an appointed administrator", "Confirm that uniform laws and regulations have been applied"), giving a clear sequence with validation for a batch administrative operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and has no need for external references; it is organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Examples, Expected Outcomes, Validation), which satisfies the simple-skill anchor for well-organized content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |