Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured conceptual decision skill with good sectioning and a verification checklist, scoring high on progressive disclosure. It is held to 2 on conciseness, actionability, and workflow clarity because guidance is prompt-based without a decisive rule or explicit in-flow validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add an explicit decision rule (e.g., 'If any warning sign is present, do not attack or require a 3:1 force ratio') so the guidance is decisive rather than a list of questions.
Tighten the Overview and warning-sign bullets to remove restatement of the description and self-evident explanations, raising conciseness toward the score-3 anchor.
Integrate validation checkpoints within the Steps sequence (e.g., a verify-and-proceed gate after intelligence gathering) rather than only a post-hoc Verification section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the Overview restates the frontmatter and a few warning-sign bullets ("This breeds military experience") elaborate on fairly evident points, so it could be tightened past the lean score-3 bar. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete questions and verification checks are present, but it prompts and describes rather than giving a decisive rule (e.g., a threshold for when to attack), leaving a key detail incomplete per the score-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced (1–4) with a separate Verification section, but per-step validation checkpoints are implicit and there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, fitting the score-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Decision Points, Steps, Verification), meeting the score-3 simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |