Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, well-structured procedural framework with concrete decision logic, fine schedules, and a validation checklist. The main improvements are removing the generic 'Expected Outcomes' padding, defining the undefined flaw terms, and adding an explicit validation-retry feedback loop.
Suggestions
Remove or sharpen the 'Expected Outcomes' section, which reads as generic benefit statements rather than instruction.
Define the undefined flaw terms (官狱, 内狱) under 'Handling Judicial Errors' so the mitigation step is actionable.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Validation section (e.g., 'if a check fails, re-run the graduated process or grant amnesty per the doubt protocol') to push workflow clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with tight tables and bullet lists; the 'Expected Outcomes' section ('Fair adjudication with graduated response', 'Reduced wrongful convictions') is generic benefit language that could be trimmed, keeping it just below the lean/5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is present — an explicit graduated decision tree (五刑→五罚→五过), a fine-rate table, and crime counts — with minor gaps such as 官狱/内狱 being listed without definition, so it sits above the incomplete/3 anchor but not at fully executable/5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced process (initial hearing → graduated judgment → error handling → doubt/amnesty) is paired with a Validation section, and validation is present so the destructive-operation cap does not apply; it misses a 5 because there is no explicit 'if validation fails, fix and re-check' feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with well-organized, clearly headed sections and no nested references; at slightly over 50 lines it is not the textbook simple-skill case for a 5, and the fine schedule / crime-category tables could arguably live in reference material, placing it at good-structure/4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |