govern-through-accessible-justice

Use when designing governance systems that ensure fair access to justice across all social levels. Covers territorial tours, open-air administration, and prompt dispute resolution following the model of rulers who personally judged cases under trees.

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_083/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, lean instruction-only skill with a clear step sequence and a verification section. Its weakness is actionability: directives are concrete in spirit but lack the specific parameters needed to execute them unambiguously.

Suggestions

Add specifics to the steps — e.g., a tour cadence ('quarterly visits to each district'), what 'prompt' dispute resolution means in days, and how to select which cases to hear on-site — to lift actionability.

Tighten step 1 by collapsing the redundant 'Visit villages and towns in person' and 'Be physically present among the people' into a single bullet.

Convert the Verification section into an explicit validate-fix-retry loop (e.g., 'If a venue is inaccessible, relocate and re-verify') to push workflow_clarity toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with no concept-explanation padding, but minor redundancy ('Visit villages and towns in person' / 'Be physically present among the people') and the soft 'Expected Outcomes' section leave a little to trim, fitting 4 ('efficient; minor over-explanation') rather than 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete directives and an example exist ('Choose simple, public locations (e.g., under a tree)', 'Handle legal cases and government affairs on-site') but key execution details are missing — tour frequency, case selection, what 'prompt' means — matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Four numbered steps are clearly sequenced and a dedicated Verification section adds three checkpoints (confirm personal visits, validate accessible venues, check prompt resolution), but there is no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop, so it stops at 4 rather than 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Verification), meeting the simple-skill exception where good section organization alone earns 5.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both 'what' and 'when' explicitly with a distinctive, niche trigger and several concrete activities. Its main weakness is trigger-term phrasing that leans literary rather than natural, and a single trigger condition instead of varied synonyms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and lists several concrete activities — 'territorial tours, open-air administration, and prompt dispute resolution' plus 'rulers who personally judged cases under trees' — giving multiple specific actions with only minor coverage gaps, fitting the 4 anchor better than 3's '1-2 concrete actions'.	4 / 5
Completeness	Both halves are present — 'Use when designing governance systems that ensure fair access to justice...' (when) and 'Covers territorial tours, open-air administration, and prompt dispute resolution' (what) — but the trigger condition is singular and could use more explicit variations, so it lands at 4 rather than the multi-trigger 5 anchor.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant keywords exist ('governance systems', 'fair access to justice', 'dispute resolution') but the phrasing is literary rather than what a user naturally types, and no synonyms or variations are offered, matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche is extremely distinctive — 'rulers who personally judged cases under trees' and 'open-air administration' would not overlap with any other skill — giving a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_083/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 13 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.