Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instructional skill with a clear four-step workflow and an explicit validation section. The main limitation is that its guidance is somewhat abstract/directive rather than granularly executable, which is inherent to a governance-methodology skill.
Suggestions
Add brief, concrete sub-tactics or criteria for each step (e.g., what 'study and respect local customs' concretely involves) to lift actionability from directive to executable.
Expand the Validation section into an explicit feedback loop (verify -> if failing, return to which step -> re-verify) to make error recovery actionable.
Consider a short 'When not to use this method' boundary note to sharpen distinctiveness and prevent misapplication to already-assimilated territories.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; each step is three tight bullets that all earn their place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instructional guidance is given per step (e.g., 'Reduce bureaucratic complexity', 'Facilitate trade routes'), but it stays at a directive level rather than fully executable specifics, fitting 'mostly executable with minor gaps' rather than the fully copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered steps are clearly sequenced and followed by an explicit Validation section with three checkpoints, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor; the skill is not destructive/batch so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; per the simple-skill scoring note, clean sectioned structure qualifies for the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |