Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise methodology skill with a clear step sequence, concrete decision rules, and an explicit validation checklist. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete output template showing how conflicting accounts should be documented side by side.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example or output template showing how two conflicting accounts are preserved side by side with uncertainty notation, to lift actionability toward fully executable guidance.
Add an explicit feedback loop in the Validation section (e.g., 'if a check fails, return to the relevant Step and re-document') to make error recovery concrete.
Consider including one or two natural-language trigger synonyms (e.g., 'source criticism', 'historiographic comparison') in the description to broaden trigger coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; bilingual glosses like '乖异 - points of divergence' earn their place by disambiguating terminology rather than explaining background. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names concrete source types (谍记, 历谱谍) and gives clear conditional decision rules, but as an instruction-only skill it stops short of a concrete output template or example of the side-by-side uncertainty notation, leaving minor gaps below the fully executable 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps form a clear sequence, reinforced by explicit Decision Points and a dedicated Validation section with three concrete checks; it lacks an explicit 'if validation fails, return to step X' feedback loop, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is well under 50 lines, single-purpose, with clearly organized sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Validation), so the simple-skill exception applies and well-organized sections warrant the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |