Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise procedural skill with clear phase sequencing and an end-of-process validation checklist. Adding per-phase checkpoints and a few precise ritual parameters would lift actionability and workflow clarity to full marks.
Suggestions
Insert a brief validation checkpoint between each phase (e.g. confirm artifacts/materials ready before ascending) rather than only a terminal validation block.
Add an explicit failure/retry loop in the Validation section ('if a requirement is unmet, do not proceed; address and re-check').
Specify a few concrete parameters for the vaguer steps — e.g. how participants are purified, what the prayers for continued blessing entail — to make the guidance copy-paste actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and list-driven with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (prerequisites, phases, precedents, warnings, validation) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each phase contains concrete actions ('Ascend Mount Tai from south side', 'Bury jade documents (玉牒书)', 'Grant amnesty'), but several steps lack precise parameters such as exact ritual wording or dates, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase sequence is clear and a Validation section checks legitimacy, sequence order, and key artifacts, but validation sits only at the end with no explicit 'validate-then-fix-retry' feedback loop between phases. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files present and the body under 50 lines, the well-organized sections (Prerequisites, Ceremony Steps, Precedents, Warnings, Validation) satisfy the simple-skill exception for full progressive-disclosure marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |