Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction-only protocol with concrete specifics and an explicit validation section. The main gap is the absence of an explicit retry loop when validation checks fail.
Suggestions
Add a brief feedback loop under Validation, e.g. 'If a region's weights/measurements are inconsistent, re-issue standards and re-verify before closing the tour.'
For the Southern/Western/Northern tours, instead of only 'Follow same protocol as eastern tour', note any direction-specific ritual or gift differences to avoid ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, terse bullet structure with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, e.g. 'Standardize: calendar, measurements, weights'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout (months, 'Dai Zong (Mount Tai)', 'fire ritual (祡)', 'five jade tablets (五瑞)') with minor gaps; no code but appropriately instruction-only. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit Validation section, but lacking an explicit retry/feedback loop for failed validation checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with no bundle files; content is well-organized into Overview, Steps, Cycle Schedule, Expected Outcomes, and Validation sections with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |