CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

intelligence-deception-operation

Use when planning military ambushes using double agents and staged evidence. Covers agent selection, credibility establishment, force coordination, and engagement triggers to lure enemies into prepared positions.

71

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, well-structured, and includes explicit verification checkpoints alongside risk and failure guidance. The main gap is actionability: guidance is descriptive rather than operational, with no concrete commands or scripts.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explanation of basic concepts, and every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

Steps are concrete and include a specific staged-evidence example ('Fake execution of prisoners, display their bodies as proof'), but as an instruction-only skill some steps remain high-level rather than fully copy-paste executable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence is paired with a dedicated Verification section containing validation checkpoints, but the steps are descriptive rather than command-driven and the error-recovery feedback loop is only lightly sketched.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Risk Factors, Failure Points, Outcomes, Verification), this meets the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly answers what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete capability coverage and a distinct, low-conflict niche. Third-person voice is correctly used throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions ('agent selection, credibility establishment, force coordination, and engagement triggers') with only minor coverage gaps, matching the 'lists several specific actions' anchor rather than the comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Covers agent selection...') and 'when' ('Use when planning military ambushes...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when planning military ambushes using double agents and staged evidence' provides natural trigger phrasing users would actually say, though synonym/extension coverage is limited compared to the comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The military-ambush/deception niche is highly specific with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills, matching the 'clear niche' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.