Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and includes explicit verification checkpoints alongside risk and failure guidance. The main gap is actionability: guidance is descriptive rather than operational, with no concrete commands or scripts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explanation of basic concepts, and every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are concrete and include a specific staged-evidence example ('Fake execution of prisoners, display their bodies as proof'), but as an instruction-only skill some steps remain high-level rather than fully copy-paste executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is paired with a dedicated Verification section containing validation checkpoints, but the steps are descriptive rather than command-driven and the error-recovery feedback loop is only lightly sketched. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Overview, Steps, Risk Factors, Failure Points, Outcomes, Verification), this meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |