military-campaign-assessment

Use when deciding whether to launch a military campaign or evaluating battle readiness. Applies Sun Wu's advice to King Helu of Wu: assess troop fatigue (民劳), alliance potential, enemy leadership weaknesses, and multi-pronged coordination.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_067/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, well-structured, and includes explicit validation gates that lift workflow clarity to the top anchor. The main gap is actionability: the guidance is descriptive rather than executable, with no concrete procedure, rubric, or tooling to operationalize each assessment factor.

Suggestions

Make each assessment step actionable by adding a concrete scoring rubric or checklist (e.g. 'Rate troop fatigue 1-5 from rest-days-since-last-campaign; delay if ≤2') instead of 'Assess whether soldiers are rested or exhausted'.

Provide a one-line template or decision matrix for the go/no-go Decision Points so the output is directly producible rather than implied.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line states an assessment factor or decision rule, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	Guidance is concrete in intent (named factors like 'assess troop fatigue', 'identify states with grievances') but instructional rather than executable — there is no code, command, or specific procedure to run, leaving key execution details implicit.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The five-step sequence is clearly ordered and closes with an explicit Validation section ('Confirm troop readiness', 'Verify that strategic alliances are secured', 'Check that the enemy assessment is complete — ... before proceeding'), a feedback/checkpoint structure that matches the 5 anchor; the campaign-go/no-go decision points act as validation gates.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	For a ~45-line single-purpose skill with no external references needed, content is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Validation), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score with no nested or buried references.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it pairs a concrete 'Use when' trigger with a clearly scoped niche and four specific assessment actions, and is highly distinct. Trigger-term coverage is the weakest dimension — it covers the obvious phrases but misses synonyms a user might naturally say.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms to include natural synonyms a user might say, e.g. 'Use when planning a war, invasion, or offensive — or evaluating whether forces are ready for battle'.

Consider naming the canonical historical text ('The Art of War' / Sunzi bingfa) so users referencing that work trigger the skill.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete assessment actions — 'assess troop fatigue (民劳), alliance potential, enemy leadership weaknesses, and multi-pronged coordination' — with only minor gaps in coverage compared to the comprehensive 5 anchor.	4 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both 'what' (applies Sun Wu's advice to assess four named factors) and 'when' ('Use when deciding whether to launch a military campaign or evaluating battle readiness') with a concrete trigger phrase, matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger phrases like 'launch a military campaign' and 'evaluating battle readiness' are present, but it lacks common synonyms/variations a user might naturally say (e.g. 'war', 'invasion', 'battle plan'), placing it at the 'some relevant keywords' anchor rather than full coverage.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The military-campaign niche with named historical source (Sun Wu, King Helü of Wu) and domain-specific triggers is highly distinct with minimal overlap risk against other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_067/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.