CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

military-reform-implementation

Use when implementing transformative reforms against cultural or traditionalist opposition. Covers three phases: strategic assessment of vulnerabilities, building support through advisor endorsement and opponent engagement, and decisive implementation by leading by example with the principle that sages adapted to circumstances.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_117/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, lean instruction-only playbook with clear sequencing and an explicit Verification section providing validation checkpoints. Its only soft spot is mild abstraction in the framing sections and the inherently situational nature of its actionability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body uses lean bullet phrases with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, though the Overview and Expected Outcomes sections add mild abstraction that could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5 or 3.

4 / 5

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized, and directives are concrete ('do not send messengers alone', 'adopt the reform personally and publicly first', 'do not allow half-measures'), but the guidance remains situational rather than copy-paste concrete, matching anchor 4 rather than 5 or 3.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 3-phase/8-step sequence is paired with an explicit Verification section containing three validation checkpoints (advisor endorsement before announcement, personal visits to opponents, leader adopting changes before requiring others), matching anchor 5's explicit validation and checklist pattern; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this strategic skill.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a self-contained single file under ~70 lines with no need for external references and clear section headers (Overview, Phases 1-3, Key Arguments, Expected Outcomes, Verification), so per the simple-skills note it scores 5 on well-organized structure alone.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with a distinct niche and several concrete phases. Its main weakness is trigger-term breadth: a single relevant phrase without synonyms or variations users would naturally say.

Suggestions

Add concrete trigger variations and synonyms a user would naturally say (e.g., 'Use when driving organizational change, overcoming stakeholder resistance, or pushing adoption of new practices against tradition').

Broaden the 'when' clause with a few distinct situational triggers so it reads with multiple concrete entry points rather than one abstract condition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete phases (strategic assessment of vulnerabilities, building support through advisor endorsement and opponent engagement, decisive implementation by leading by example) with only minor coverage gaps, matching anchor 4 rather than 5 (not a comprehensive list of discrete capabilities) or 3 (clearly more than 1-2 actions).

4 / 5

Completeness

Both a clear 'what' (the three-phase implementation approach) and an explicit 'Use when...' trigger are present, but the 'when' is somewhat abstract and narrow rather than framed with multiple concrete trigger situations, matching anchor 4 rather than 5 or 3.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes one relevant natural phrase ('implementing transformative reforms against cultural or traditionalist opposition') but lacks synonyms or variations a user would naturally say, fitting anchor 3 rather than 4 (no broader keyword set) or 2 (a real, relevant natural phrase is present).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger is scoped to a distinct niche (transformative reform against cultural/traditionalist opposition) with minimal overlap risk versus typical skills, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5 (trigger could be more concretely distinguishable) or 3.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.