Content
91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose task, with concrete commands and a copy-paste filename-generation snippet. Its only meaningful gap is the absence of an explicit validation/feedback loop around the staging step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: numbered steps, exact git commands, and a tight message-format spec with no padding or explanation of git concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives fully executable commands (git status --short, git diff --cached, git log --oneline -5) and a copy-paste-ready python3 snippet that produces the unique temp filename, covering the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The two-mode workflow is clearly sequenced with checkpoints (展示文件清单, git diff --cached --stat confirmation), but it lacks an explicit validation/feedback loop for the staging step (e.g. what to do if git add fails or staged content is empty). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files, and the content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (铁律, 带参数模式, 生成消息步骤, 消息格式, 输出后), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |