Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-organized instruction-only skill with concrete steps and explicit validation checkpoints. It falls just short of top marks on actionability and workflow clarity due to absent quantitative specifics and error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
Tighten the Overview and Expected Outcomes sections to avoid restating the opening line and the step content.
Add quantitative or mechanical specifics to the steps (e.g., what 'smaller'/'larger' means in practice) to make the guidance more directly executable.
Add a short error-recovery loop to the Validation section (e.g., 'if loyalty is not translating to influence, recalibrate the distribution ratio and re-check').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the Overview and Expected Outcomes sections partially restate the intro, leaving minor trimmable padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific guidance ("smaller measures when collecting taxes", "larger measures when distributing grain") with only minor gaps — no quantitative specifics or implementation mechanism. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered step sequence plus an explicit Validation section with three checkpoints, but no error-recovery feedback loop (validate → fix → retry), so it sits below the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, yet well-organized into clear sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |