Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized self-contained skill body with a clear step sequence and a validation checklist. Its weakness is actionability and workflow integration: guidance is abstract and validation is appended rather than woven in as feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add concrete trigger criteria for intervention — e.g., a price band or relative threshold defining 'too high (贵)' and 'too low (贱)' — so the buy-low/sell-high steps are actionable rather than abstract directives.
Integrate validation as inline feedback checkpoints (e.g., 'after releasing goods, confirm prices stabilized; if not, adjust release volume') instead of only a final appendix section.
Attach quantifiable success metrics to the Expected Outcomes (富商大贾无所牟大利, 万物不得腾踊) so the verification steps can be checked concretely rather than by assertion.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-driven sections with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor redundancy is the intro restating the description, but every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps name policy actions ('Release goods from government stores', 'Sell at reasonable prices') but stay abstract — no price thresholds, trigger criteria, or metrics for 'too high (贵)'/'too low (贱)', leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Step 1–4 are clearly sequenced and a Validation section exists, but checkpoints are appended rather than integrated and there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single-purpose, self-contained body uses well-organized sections (Core Principle, Implementation Steps, Supporting Policies, Outcomes, Warning, Validation), qualifying for 3 under the simple-skill note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |