Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable, well-sequenced procedural skill with genuine validation checkpoints. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure: all content lives inline in one ~90-line file with no references to split out the pulse-qualities table or seasonal correlation.
Suggestions
Move the eight-pulse-qualities table and the seasonal-correlation detail into a referenced file (e.g. PULSE_QUALITIES.md) and link it from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
Add a short 'Quick reference' section at the top pointing to the deeper sections, so the overview signals where detail lives.
Consider extracting the 寸/关/尺 organ mappings into a reference table file to keep the core procedure leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet/table format with no padding explaining what pulse diagnosis is; it assumes competence and every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance: named positions with organ mappings, three named depths, a qualities table with indications, and a quantified calibration rule (4-5 pulses per breath). For an instruction-only skill this is copy-ready procedure. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Examination steps are explicitly sequenced and a dedicated Verification section provides validation checkpoints (confirm all positions/depths examined, correlate findings, ensure documentation) before conclusions are formed. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into sections but it is a single ~90-line monolithic file with no external references or progressive-disclosure signaling; the over-50-line size keeps it out of the simple-skill exemption, so it sits at the 'some structure but inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |