CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

responding-to-political-criticism

Use when facing public criticism or accusations in a political or organizational context. Guides officials to preserve reputation through humble acknowledgment, symbolic authority surrender, and strategic resignation offers rather than retaliation.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_197/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit verification checkpoints, appropriate for a simple instruction-only skill. It is held back by rhetorical padding in the Warning section and symbolic actions that are not executable in modern contexts.

Suggestions

Replace the archaic symbolic actions ('remove hat and surrender official seal') with concrete modern equivalents or frame them explicitly as a metaphor so the guidance is actionable today.

Trim the rhetorical 'Warning' section or convert it into actionable guidance; remove redundancy between 'Expected Outcomes' and step 5.

Add a concrete modern example utterance for step 3 beyond the single scripted line, so the humble acknowledgment is adaptable to varied situations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Warning' section is rhetorical padding ('appear like a common merchant or quarreling woman') and 'Expected Outcomes' restates step 5, so not every token earns its place.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides a concrete scripted statement ('I have been fortunate to serve...') but the symbolic actions ('remove hat and surrender official seal') are archaic/pseudocode-like and not practically executable in modern organizational contexts, leaving key details incomplete.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–5 give a clear sequence and the 'Verification' section supplies explicit checkpoints (confirm no counter-accusations, confirm authority surrendered before the superior's decision, confirm accuser lost moral high ground).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files; the content is well-organized into Overview, Steps, Expected Outcomes, Warning, and Verification sections, which meets the simple-skill bar.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-constructed: third-person voice, explicit 'Use when' trigger, and several concrete named actions. Its main weakness is trigger-term coverage, which relies on a few phrases rather than a spread of natural variations a user might say.

Suggestions

Broaden the trigger terms with more natural phrasings a user would actually say (e.g. 'called out', 'publicly attacked', 'under fire', 'facing allegations') rather than relying on 'public criticism or accusations'.

Soften the jargon 'symbolic authority surrender' in the description to a more user-recognizable phrase so the trigger is less likely to miss.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — "humble acknowledgment, symbolic authority surrender, and strategic resignation offers" — matching the anchor for naming several specific actions rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

It answers both what ("Guides officials to preserve reputation through...") and when ("Use when facing public criticism or accusations...") with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It uses some natural terms ("public criticism or accusations", "political or organizational context") but coverage of common variations is thin and phrases like "symbolic authority surrender" are unlikely to be words a user would naturally say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is specific — reputation preservation via humility/resignation in political/organizational contexts — with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.