soldier-centered-leadership

Use when building deep military loyalty and unit cohesion. Shares hardships, distributes rewards equitably, and leads by example to create soldiers willing to follow into the most dangerous engagements.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with explicit verification checkpoints and no padding; its main gap is the absence of concrete situational examples that would make the leadership principles fully actionable.

Suggestions

Add 1-2 brief concrete scenarios illustrating how to apply a principle in the field (e.g. how to handle reward distribution after a successful engagement), raising actionability to copy-paste-ready guidance.

Optionally add a short 'how to check' example in the Verification section, such as specific questions to ask subordinates about perceived equity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and well-organized into tight bullet lists with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Actionability	It gives concrete directive guidance ("Do not drink water until all soldiers have drunk", "Distribute all rewards and gifts among subordinates") but provides no situational examples or concrete scenarios showing how to apply the principles; this fits score-2 (concrete but incomplete, missing key details) rather than score-3 (specific examples, copy-paste ready).	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Although not a multi-step code workflow, this simple single-purpose skill is clearly organized and includes an explicit Verification section with validation checkpoints ("Confirm...", "Validate that...", "Check unit morale indicators"), which the simple-skills scoring note permits to score 3.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, and is organized into clear sections (Overview, Core Principles, Expected Outcomes, Verification); per the simple-skills scoring note this qualifies for score 3.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description with an explicit Use-when trigger and several concrete actions; its only weakness is limited breadth of natural trigger-term variations for its niche domain.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger terms to include phrasings a user might naturally say, e.g. 'Use when a commander wants to build unit morale, reduce desertion, or strengthen soldier loyalty during hard campaigns.'

Consider adding a concrete outcome-oriented keyword (e.g. 'morale', 'desertion', 'battlefield loyalty') to improve natural-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description lists multiple concrete actions in third person — "Shares hardships, distributes rewards equitably, and leads by example" — matching the score-3 anchor for multiple specific concrete actions, and it is not the level below because it goes beyond naming a single domain+action.	3 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what (shares hardships, distributes rewards equitably, leads by example) and when ("Use when building deep military loyalty and unit cohesion") with an explicit trigger clause, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not a 2 because the 'when' is explicit rather than implied.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It includes some natural trigger terms ("military loyalty", "unit cohesion") via an explicit "Use when" clause, but coverage of variations a user might actually say is limited; it is not a 3 because it lacks the broad term coverage of the top anchor and not a 1 because real keywords are present.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It occupies a clear niche (military loyalty/cohesion leadership) with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap other skills, matching the score-3 anchor; it is not a 2 because the domain is specific rather than broadly overlapping.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_208/SKILL.md
Commit: 79c272f

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.