CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

strategic-decision-famine-aid

Use when deciding whether to provide famine aid to a rival state. Balances humanitarian and strategic interests by consulting multiple advisors, weighing long-term diplomatic reputation against short-term military opportunity. Based on Qin's aid to Jin.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A clean, well-organized instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a real validation checkpoint. Its main weakness is actionability: the decision steps describe considerations rather than giving a concrete, executable decision procedure.

Suggestions

Add a concrete decision rule or threshold for the Make the Decision step (e.g., a scoring checklist or if/then conditions for aid vs. withhold) so the guidance is executable rather than 'weigh the factors'.

Replace abstract prompts ('Assess opportunity', 'Consider long-term consequences') with specific questions or criteria that produce a determinate answer.

Tighten the Execute Aid Delivery step with concrete logistics checks (e.g., verify convoy capacity, transit route safety) instead of only restating 'boats and carts'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Validation).

3 / 3

Actionability

Most steps give abstract guidance ("Consider", "Assess", "Weigh") rather than a concrete decision procedure, with only the execution step offering specifics ("boats and carts", "continuous supply line"); there is no decision tree, threshold, or scoring rubric to apply.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Six clearly sequenced steps are followed by an explicit Validation checklist that functions as a feedback checkpoint (verify advisors consulted, confirm the ruler/people distinction, check supply line), matching the top anchor for a simple instruction skill.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single concise SKILL.md with no bundle files and well-organized sections; per the rubric's simple-skills note, this short single-purpose skill scores 3 on progressive disclosure with just clean sectioning.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, distinctive description that states an explicit trigger, concrete capabilities, and the when-condition all in one concise sentence. It would naturally surface for the intended use case and is unlikely to conflict with other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions: "provide famine aid to a rival state", "consulting multiple advisors", and "weighing long-term diplomatic reputation against short-term military opportunity", matching the top anchor for several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Balances humanitarian and strategic interests by consulting multiple advisors...") and when ("Use when deciding whether to provide famine aid to a rival state") with an explicit 'Use when' clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger terms a user would say are present ("famine aid", "rival state", "diplomatic reputation", "strategic interests"), giving good coverage of phrasings users would actually invoke.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is narrow and distinctive (famine aid to a rival state with humanitarian/strategic tradeoffs) and unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill, with clearly distinct triggers.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.