strategic-position-advancement

Use when competing against more established figures for leadership positions. Advances career through strategic yielding—publicly advocating for the rival while securing an alternative position of equal authority (e.g., Chancellor vs. Grand Commandant).

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_199/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and concise with clear sequencing and validation, scoring highly on organization. Its weakest area is actionability, where several steps describe outcomes (e.g., 'Gain fame for humility') rather than concrete actions to take.

Suggestions

Make abstract steps actionable: replace 'Build reputation - Gain fame for humility' with concrete behaviors (e.g., 'Publicly praise the rival's merit and defer credit in front of decision-makers').

Add a short feedback/checkpoint loop in Steps (e.g., 'If no equivalent alternative position exists, do not yield—reassess the competition') to lift workflow_clarity to 5.

Trim the Overview sentence, which largely restates the description, to improve conciseness toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with concise list-based sections and no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor over-explanation is the Overview restating the description, keeping it just below the 'every token earns its place' level 5.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides some concrete guidance (e.g., 'Determine if alternative positions offer equal authority (e.g., Chancellor vs. Grand Commandant)') but several steps are abstract aspirations ('Build reputation - Gain fame for humility and respect for established merit') with no concrete method, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step sequence is paired with a dedicated Verification section containing explicit pre-action checkpoints ('Confirm... before yielding to the rival'), but no validate→fix→retry feedback loop is present, so it sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' rather than 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into well-labeled sections (Overview, Steps, Decision Points, Expected Outcomes, Verification), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it follows the canonical 'what + Use when' pattern with concrete actions and a highly distinctive niche. Its main limitation is a single trigger condition and some domain jargon ('strategic yielding') that could use natural synonyms.

Suggestions

Add natural trigger synonyms/variants to the 'when' clause (e.g., 'or when vying for a position against a senior, better-supported rival') to push completeness and trigger_term_quality to 5.

Consider replacing or glossing the jargon 'strategic yielding' with plainer phrasing a user would actually say.

Briefly mention the assessment/reputation-building actions already in the body to close the minor coverage gap in specificity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions ('publicly advocating for the rival', 'securing an alternative position of equal authority', 'strategic yielding') with only minor coverage gaps, matching the 'several specific actions' anchor rather than the 1-2 actions at level 3.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both what it does ('Advances career through strategic yielding...') and when to use it ('Use when competing against...'), but the 'when' is a single trigger condition without variants, fitting 'could be more explicit or specific' at level 4 rather than the multi-trigger level 5.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The 'Use when competing against more established figures for leadership positions' clause is a natural, explicit trigger with good keyword coverage, though 'strategic yielding' is domain jargon and a few natural synonyms are missing, keeping it below 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear, narrow niche (strategic yielding in leadership competition) with distinct triggers and essentially no overlap risk with other skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: baojie/shiji-kb
Path: kg/ontology/ontology-v1/skus/procedural/skill_199/SKILL.md
Commit: 6b836e3

Reviewed: 13 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.