Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean instruction skill with sequenced procedures and a validation section. Its main gaps are untranslated Chinese material terms and the absence of explicit feedback loops between steps.
Suggestions
Gloss or translate the Chinese-only material terms (薪柴→firewood, 竹木→bamboo/timber, 石块→stone) so the steps are executable without domain knowledge.
Insert an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint between steps (e.g., after surveying, confirm drainage patterns before moving to channel management).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet points that assume competence (e.g., "禹抑洪水十三年，过家不入门" with no padding), with only minor generic content in "Expected Outcomes" that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are concrete and ordered with specifics ("Map the river course from source to sea", "Calculate gradient for gravity flow", material lists), but several materials appear only in untranslated Chinese (薪柴, 竹木, 石块), a minor executability gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both flood-control and irrigation procedures are clearly sequenced (Step 1–3) and a dedicated Validation checklist closes the process, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop between steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested references; at ~70 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-lines simple-skill threshold, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |