The ~30-line body is lean, assumes competence, and contains no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (Steps, Core Principle, Expected Outcomes, Verification) earns its place. Not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to trim.

Steps are specific directives ('Adopt new name', 'Target 10% margin', 'Farm and work alongside family') but several are abstract rather than executable ('Find center of the world with good trade routes', 'Buy low, sell high; observe market cycles'). Not 1 because directives are concrete and named, not 3 because there is no concrete mechanism for executing the vaguer steps.

Eight steps are clearly sequenced and an explicit Verification section supplies three validation checkpoints. Not 2 because validation is present and explicit rather than implicit or missing.

This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent) and well-organized sections, satisfying the simple-skill note that allows a 3 without external file references.

The description enumerates concrete actions: 'change identity, select trade-route hubs, practice honest labor, target modest 10% margins, and redistribute wealth when fame grows too large', matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

An explicit 'Use when rebuilding wealth in a new location while avoiding political danger' trigger answers when, and the colon-separated action list answers what. Not 2 because the when-clause is explicit rather than merely implied.

'rebuilding wealth in a new location while avoiding political danger' offers relevant but niche terms with limited variation coverage; it lacks the breadth of natural keyword variations users might say. Not 3 because coverage is thin, not 1 because the terms are natural rather than jargon.

The Fan Li / Tao Zhu Gong wealth-relocation niche is highly distinctive with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not 2 because it does not overlap meaningfully with generic skills.