CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

munger-observer

Daily wisdom review applying Charlie Munger's mental models to your work and thinking. Use when asked to review decisions, analyze thinking patterns, detect biases, apply mental models, do a "Munger review", or run the Munger Observer. Triggers on scheduled daily reviews or manual requests like "run munger observer", "review my thinking", "check for blind spots", or "apply mental models".

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete model-application prompts, a copy-paste output template, and a worked example that make it directly actionable. The main gaps are a vague 'scan session logs' instruction and absence of explicit validation checkpoints, though the non-destructive nature softens the latter.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Gather Today's Activity' step: specify where session logs live and how to locate today's entries (e.g., path pattern or transcript tool) so Claude can execute it without guessing.

Add a brief validation checkpoint after gathering activity (e.g., 'Confirm at least one decision or task was found before proceeding; if none, emit the all-clear output') to close the workflow loop.

Consider moving the full mental-models catalog into a references/ file and keeping SKILL.md as an overview, which would push progressive disclosure toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body with bullet prompts and a compact output template; avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. The motivational quotes and worked example add modest length but stay purposeful, so it sits at 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the lean 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete per-model prompts ('What could go wrong?', 'Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome'), a copy-paste output template, and a worked example — mostly executable guidance. Falls short of 5 because the gather step ('Scan session logs for today's activity') is somewhat vague about where/how to scan.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear three-step sequence (Gather → Apply Mental Models → Generate Output) with a conditional output branch. This is not a destructive/batch operation so the validation cap does not apply; it misses the 5 anchor only because there are no explicit validation/checkpoint steps beyond the insights-vs-nothing branch.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized with clear section headers (Process, Output Format, Example, Scheduling) and self-contained with no external references needed. It exceeds the ~50-line simple-skill threshold and the mental-models catalog could arguably live in a reference file, so it lands at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-constructed description that clearly conveys both purpose and trigger conditions with natural user phrasings and a distinctive niche. Minor room to sharpen the action verbs from abstract review language toward fully enumerated concrete capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('review decisions, analyze thinking patterns, detect biases, apply mental models'), all within its niche; falls just short of the 'comprehensive coverage' anchor because the actions are somewhat abstract rather than fully enumerated.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does ('Daily wisdom review applying Charlie Munger's mental models') and when to use it ('Use when asked to... Triggers on scheduled daily reviews or manual requests like...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage with synonyms and exact user phrasings ('run munger observer', 'review my thinking', 'check for blind spots', 'apply mental models', 'Munger review'), matching the 'comprehensive coverage including synonyms' anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinct niche ('Charlie Munger's mental models', 'Munger Observer', 'Munger review') with unique triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
bap-jorkim/agent-skills-fork-feb-25
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.