Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellently structured workflow that is lean, concrete, and well-sequenced with the right validation checkpoints for a shared-workspace write. It assumes Claude's competence and provides actionable, specific guidance throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; it assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what frontmatter, UUIDs, or MCP are) and each line carries actionable content, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Though instruction-only, the guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready — it names exact MCP tools (read_note, write_note), arguments (project_id vs project, directory, title), and frontmatter fields (shared_from:) with a defined observation format. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints for a teammate-visible write: stop if teamProjects is empty, confirm before writing and wait for a yes, and don't overwrite an existing note unless told. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained single-task skill with well-organized Steps and Notes sections and no need for external references; with no bundle files present, well-organized sections suffice for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |