CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fix-pr-issues

Use when addressing Basic Memory pull request feedback, failed checks, or Codex review blockers, then re-running the latest-head review gate.

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-sequenced instruction skill that assumes Claude's competence and bakes in explicit validation checkpoints and a feedback loop. The only soft spot is actionability, where a few steps could give the exact command rather than delegate.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is actionable, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (`gh pr view --json …`, `git commit -s`) alongside specific directives, but several steps ('Push the branch') omit the exact command and detail is delegated to `pr-review-loop`, leaving minor gaps short of fully copy-paste-ready coverage.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear Gather→Fix→Push And Recheck→Reply sequence with explicit validation (Codex gate, 'zero unresolved, non-outdated Codex threads') and a feedback loop ('If new feedback appears … repeat the loop'), satisfying the validation requirement for batch/review operations.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized section headers and no need for external references; per the simple-skill exception this earns the top anchor for clear organization alone.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-scoped, third-person description that pairs an explicit 'Use when…' trigger with concrete domain-specific capabilities. It is highly distinctive but slightly below the top tier on completeness and keyword coverage because the what/when are fused and a few natural synonyms are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete items ('pull request feedback, failed checks, or Codex review blockers' plus 're-running the latest-head review gate'), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor rather than the comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Answers both what (address feedback/checks/blockers then re-run the gate) and when (explicit 'Use when…' clause); not a 5 because the what and when are fused rather than cleanly separated with fully concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user-facing phrases like 'pull request feedback', 'failed checks', and 'review blockers'; falls short of 5 because common synonyms (e.g., 'CI', 'reviews', 'PR comments') are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a clear niche ('Basic Memory', 'Codex review blockers', 'latest-head review gate') with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
basicmachines-co/basic-memory
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.