CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fix-pr-issues

Use when addressing Basic Memory pull request feedback, failed checks, or Codex review blockers, then re-running the latest-head review gate.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a concise, well-sequenced workflow with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and a feedback loop. It is an exemplar instruction-only skill with no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

A lean ~45-line body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the level-3 lean-and-efficient anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (`gh pr view --json ...`, `git commit -s`) and a defined issue-ledger structure with explicit verification requirements, reaching the level-3 copy-paste-ready anchor for an instruction skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced Gather → Fix → Push And Recheck → Reply flow with explicit validation checkpoints (confirm checks running on the new headRefOid, require current-head approval and zero unresolved Codex threads) and a stated feedback loop to repeat on new feedback, matching the level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references; per the simple-skills scoring note this qualifies for the level-3 anchor, and no bundle files need deeper structure.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, third-person description that covers both capability and explicit trigger guidance within a distinct Basic Memory niche. It could broaden natural trigger phrasing beyond its jargon-heavy terms.

Suggestions

Add common-speech trigger variations such as 'PR comments', 'CI failures', or 'failing checks' so users phrase the need naturally.

Consider clarifying 'latest-head review gate' in plainer terms (e.g., 're-run the review on the newest commit') to reduce jargon.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions and targets: 'addressing...pull request feedback, failed checks, or Codex review blockers, then re-running the latest-head review gate', matching the level-3 anchor listing several specific actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does (address feedback/failed checks/blockers and re-run the review gate) and when to use it via a leading 'Use when addressing...' trigger, satisfying both halves at level 3.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some natural terms a developer would say ('pull request feedback', 'failed checks') but leans on jargon ('Codex review blockers', 'latest-head review gate') and omits common variations like 'PR comments' or 'CI failures', fitting the level-2 anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to 'Basic Memory' PR feedback and Codex review blockers — a clear, narrow niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the level-3 clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
basicmachines-co/basic-memory
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.