Conciseness

The body is dense with only novel, proprietary information (Comark syntax, query pipeline grammar, error codes) and assumes Claude's competence — e.g., it never explains what Markdown or a table is. Every section earns its tokens; no padded or generic passages are present, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: copy-paste-ready component blocks (`::bm-bars{title="Throughput" ...}` with row grammar), a decision table mapping intent to component names, concrete query pipelines (`notes | where type == decision ... | count`), and an error-code table with a specific fix per code. Per the rubric's instruction-only provision, the absence of script code is not penalized since every example can be pasted directly into a note.

Workflow Clarity

Sections follow the working order (pick → write → live views → edit → errors) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: 'Read it back after writing a live view and confirm the view has rows before you state a number in prose', error problems that 'never block the write' with instruction to 'fix them right away with edit_note', and a final five-item numbered checklist. This matches the anchor requiring explicit validation, error-recovery loops, and a checklist.

Progressive Disclosure

The body keeps only the 13 most-needed components inline and delegates the full vocabulary ('The full vocabulary, every prop, and every data grammar are in [references/components.md](references/components.md). Read it before using a component you have not used before') to a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference that exists on disk (740 lines). Navigation is easy and the split is appropriate, matching the anchor-5 structure.

Specificity

Names the domain ("Basic Memory notes") and several concrete output forms ("charts, tables, boards, and live views") plus the mechanism ("`::bm-*` Comark components"), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. It stays below anchor 5 because a single verb ("Write") carries all capability — unlike the multi-verb 'extract, fill, merge, convert' pattern — and above anchor 3 because more than 1-2 concrete elements are stated.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Write Basic Memory notes that render as charts, tables, boards, and live views with `::bm-*` Comark components") and when ("Use when a note reads better as a figure or board, or already has `::bm-*` directives") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 example structure.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ("a note reads better as a figure or board", "charts", "tables", "board") plus the distinctive "`::bm-*` directives" trigger, giving good keyword coverage. A few natural synonyms (e.g., 'kanban', 'graph', 'visual', 'diagram') are missing, so it does not reach anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche with distinct triggers: "Basic Memory" notes, "Comark", and "`::bm-*`" are unambiguous identifiers unlikely to collide with other skills. The generic words 'charts'/'tables' carry some theoretical overlap with visualization skills, but the explicit 'Use when' clauses anchor them to note-writing, keeping conflict risk minimal.