Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with an explicit, well-validated multi-step workflow and feedback loops. Its main weakness is conciseness: the core exclusion rule is repeated across many sections, inflating token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
State the 'no free account / OpenAI API / local models / web search / memory' exclusion once in the Hard Rule and reference it from later sections instead of restating it verbatim in the Validation Checklist and Failure Handling.
Consider moving the full Product Research Prompt template into a `references/` file and linking to it, improving progressive disclosure and reducing body length.
Collapse the overlapping account-selection guidance between 'Required Routes', 'Computer Use Fallback', and Workflow step 2 into a single canonical procedure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence (no explanation of what ChatGPT is), but the 'no free account / OpenAI API / web search / memory' rule is restated across the Hard Rule, Required Routes, Workflow step 3, Validation Checklist, and Failure Handling sections, adding padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — real API calls (`agent.browsers.list()`, `browser.user.openTabs()`, `browser.user.claimTab(...)`), explicit save paths (`<WORKSPACE>/reports/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md`), and a copy-paste prompt template — with only minor gaps around the GUI-driven Computer Use actions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 12-step Workflow with a dedicated Validation Checklist, explicit feedback loops (poll every 3 minutes, retry once on 'Something went wrong', extraction fallback order of copy button → DOM → accessibility tree), and stop-and-ask checkpoints, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content is inline in one well-sectioned file with clear headers (Hard Rule, Required Routes, Computer Use Fallback, Workflow, Validation Checklist, Failure Handling); structure is good, though the file exceeds 50 lines and the prompt template could optionally be split into a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |