Conciseness

The ~65-line AI-optimized prompt template is duplicated verbatim in Step 4 (lines 97-163) and Dual Mode Step 3 (lines 236-302), and padded marketing sections ('듀얼 모드 장점', '사용 시나리오', the ⭐-rating comparison table) add little instructional value — matching 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections'; not 1 because it does not extensively explain concepts Claude already knows, and not 3 because the duplication and marketing padding are substantial, not minor.

Actionability

Provides copy-pasteable WebFetch prompt strings, a real executable Node Playwright script, and concrete AskUserQuestion/Write tool-call examples, fitting 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; not 5 because the Playwright→markdown step is hand-waved ('WebFetch 프롬프트에 넣어') when WebFetch takes a URL not raw HTML, a real logic gap.

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly sequenced (Core Step 1-6, Dual Step 1-4, dynamic-content flow with a length-validation feedback loop), but the primary and batch-conversion workflows lack per-step validation checkpoints; per the rubric cap, batch operations without validation cannot score above 3 — matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'; not 4 because the batch '여러 URL 일괄 변환' flow has no per-item validation or error recovery.

Progressive Disclosure

The file has well-organized section headers, but at ~770 lines with no bundle files the detailed AI-optimized prompt template, dual-mode workflow, and Playwright fallback guide are all inlined rather than split into one-level-deep reference files — matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'; not 2 because section headers and navigation are present (not minimal structure), and not 4 because there are zero external references for a large skill.

Specificity

Quotes '웹페이지 URL을 입력받아 마크다운 형태로 변환하여 저장합니다' — names the domain plus several concrete actions (receive URL, convert to markdown, save file), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not 5 because the prominent AI-optimized/dual modes are absent, and not 3 because the actions are concrete rather than generic.

Completeness

Has a clear 'what' ('마크다운 형태로 변환하여 저장합니다') and a stated 'when' ('웹 문서를 로컬 마크다운 파일로 아카이빙하거나 정리할 때 유용합니다'), fitting 'both what and when; when could be more explicit'; not 5 because the when is a soft 'useful when' rather than an explicit 'Use when…' trigger with concrete user-utterance phrases, and not 3 because the when-context is explicitly stated, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural terms a Korean user would say — '웹페이지', 'URL', '마크다운', '웹 문서', '아카이빙', '정리' — giving good keyword coverage per the anchor 4 example; not 5 because synonyms like '링크/웹사이트/블로그' and the '.md' extension are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche '웹페이지 URL → 로컬 마크다운 파일' is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against generic web-fetch/document skills, matching the anchor 4 example; not 5 because the trigger is not as crisply differentiated as the anchor 5 example which pairs the niche with an explicit 'Use when…' clause.