Conciseness

The body is dominated by a dense forms table and compatibility map that earn their tokens, and it opens with a terse behavioral instruction rather than padding; no basic-concept explanations. Not a 5: passages of design rationale ('The compatibility spellings are permanent, not deprecated...', notes on why bare shortcuts sit outside the grammar) could be trimmed without losing actionable content; not a 3: over-explanation is minor, not systematic.

Actionability

Every entry in the forms block is a copy-paste-ready invocation with arguments, precedence is stated ('Forms are listed in the order the parser checks them'), and the non-interactive path gives exact CLI commands ('worktrail-decision answer <id> --answer "..."'). Coverage spans all parsed forms plus compatibility spellings, so common cases are fully addressed.

Workflow Clarity

For a simple display skill the single action is unambiguous and guarded ('Display this concise command reference. Do not start work, claim a brief, or run the dashboard merely because help was requested'), and the decision flow is sequenced (list → answer → auto-unblock on next drain pass). Not a 5: the interactive answer procedure and filing/resuming procedure are deferred to external references rather than sequenced inline, so checkpoints in that flow are only implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized (client table, accepted forms, grammar, decision answering), and the two deep-dive procedures are clearly signaled one-level references ('Full interactive procedure: ../worktrail-go/references/answer-decision.md'). Not a 5: those references point outside this skill's own bundle (a sibling skill's references/ directory, absent here) rather than to bundled files, so navigation depends on an external layout; not a 3: the split between inline reference content and deferred procedure detail is appropriate and clearly labeled.

Specificity

The 'what' is concrete ('Show the Worktrail front-door commands and accepted positional arguments') and the description enumerates the specific surface it covers — 'handoff, spec, pr, repo, or route forms' plus the worktrail-decision flow — leaving only minor gaps in coverage. Not a 5: the capability itself is a single display action rather than multiple concrete actions; not a 3: it goes well past 1-2 generic actions by naming the form families and the sub-tool.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both halves: 'Show the Worktrail front-door commands and accepted positional arguments' (what) and an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing four concrete trigger scenarios (when). Matches the anchor-5 example pattern of a clear what followed by concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would actually say are covered — 'how to invoke worktrail-go', 'help', 'with a bare noun', 'how to answer a filed product decision' — with synonyms (asks/wants/invokes) and the tool names. Not a 5: a few plausible trigger phrasings are missing (e.g. 'usage', 'list commands'); not a 3: coverage is far beyond 'some relevant keywords'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers are anchored to the unique tool names 'worktrail-go' and 'worktrail-decision' plus their distinctive form nouns, giving a clear niche with minimal risk of firing for unrelated skills. Second example ('bare noun') even disambiguates a common false-positive invocation.