Three parallel reviewer agents find contradictions, config gaps, and coverage holes across a project's docs, config, and tests — then fix what you approve. Heavyweight (dispatches parallel agents, can modify files); explicit invocation only. Triggers: /adversarial-review, "adversarial review", "find gaps in my docs/config".
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Security
1 high severity finding. You should review these findings carefully before considering using this skill.
The skill handles credentials insecurely by requiring the agent to include secret values verbatim in its generated output. This exposes credentials in the agent’s context and conversation history, creating a risk of data exfiltration.
Insecure credential handling detected (high risk: 1.00). The prompt instructs reviewer agents to read and quote files (including .env, config, and any discovered files) as "evidence" and to paste full finding text into subsequent agents, which will cause secrets (API keys, tokens, passwords) found in files to be included verbatim in agent outputs and prompts.
be88d6c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.