adversarial-review
Three parallel reviewer agents find contradictions, config gaps, and coverage holes across a project's docs, config, and tests — then fix what you approve. Heavyweight (dispatches parallel agents, can modify files). Supports env-var automation hooks (ADVERSARIAL_REVIEW_TARGETS, ADVERSARIAL_REVIEW_REPORT_ONLY) so an orchestrator can dispatch a programmatic validator pass without keyboard. Use only when explicitly asked: /adversarial-review, "adversarial review", "find gaps in my docs/config", OR when another skill (e.g. /feature) needs to dispatch a validator pass programmatically.
64
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
High
Do not use without reviewing
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./plugins/agentic-engineering/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 high severity finding. You should review these findings carefully before considering using this skill.
W007: Insecure credential handling detected in skill instructions.
What this means
The skill handles credentials insecurely by requiring the agent to include secret values verbatim in its generated output. This exposes credentials in the agent’s context and conversation history, creating a risk of data exfiltration.
Why it was flagged
The prompt tells agents to read project files (including .env/config files) and to return findings with "evidence (quoted text)" and then paste the full text of findings into subsequent prompts, which forces verbatim inclusion of any secrets found in files.
- Repository
- belchman/claude-skills
- Commit
77a9e6b
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.