Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, token-efficient guideline-authoring framework with concrete design tokens, a sequenced workflow, and explicit quality gates. Its main weaknesses are a small amount of explanatory fluff and the absence of worked examples showing what a produced guideline actually looks like.
Suggestions
Replace the "Brand" paragraph (which explains what bento is) with a one-line purpose statement; Claude already knows the bento concept.
Add one short worked example of a component rule (e.g. a sample "Button" rule showing anatomy, states, and token usage) so the abstract directives become concrete and copy-paste ready.
Tighten abstract Expected Behavior items like "preserve visual hierarchy" by anchoring them to a token or threshold, consistent with the skill's own Quality Gates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly compact (token lists, bullet directives, short sections), but the "Brand" sentence ("The bento box style is an innovative design approach that uses a grid layout to present content in visually appealing blocks of varying sizes") explains a concept Claude already knows, and a few Expected Behavior items are abstract; it is efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete elements are present (hex color tokens, spacing scale 4/8/12/16/24/32, typography scale, a 6-step workflow, an output structure, constraint-language rules), but there are no worked examples of actual guideline output and several directives stay abstract ("preserve visual hierarchy", "keep interaction states explicit"), leaving guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Guideline Authoring Workflow" is a clearly numbered 6-step sequence ending in a QA checklist, and the "Quality Gates" section supplies explicit validation criteria (anchor each rule to a token/threshold/example; every accessibility statement must be testable), giving clear checkpoints for this authoring task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is cleanly divided into well-labeled, navigable sections (Mission, Style Foundations, Rules, Workflow, Output Structure, Quality Gates) with no nested references or wall of text, satisfying progressive disclosure for a self-contained skill of this size. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |