Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured instruction set with a clear authoring workflow and validation gates; its main limitation is that guidance is structural rather than executable. It is appropriate for an instruction-only design-system skill.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete worked example (e.g. a sample component rule with anatomy, states, and token usage) to move guidance from structural to copy-paste ready.
Include a short illustrative token-usage snippet showing semantic tokens applied to a component to strengthen actionability.
Optionally show a one-line "good vs prohibited" implementation contrast to make the do/don't rules executable in review.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and token-efficient, avoiding re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (tokens, rules, workflow, quality gates) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete tokens (hex values, spacing scale, enumerated required states) make the guidance specific, but it remains structural rather than copy-paste ready; as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is acceptable yet guidance is not fully executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A 6-step Guideline Authoring Workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (Quality Gates, a QA checklist "executed in code review") gives a clear sequenced process with feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a self-contained overview organized into clear, well-signaled sections with no need for external references (none provided), satisfying the simple/well-organized skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |