Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured instruction skill with a clear sequenced authoring workflow and validation checkpoints via Quality Gates and a QA checklist. Its main weakness is actionability: it gives excellent rules and constraints but no worked example of a generated guideline to anchor the output.
Suggestions
Include one short worked example of a completed Fiction guideline (e.g., a Button component rule with anatomy, states, and token usage) so the expected output is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
Tie the 'Example Constraint Language' section to that example so 'must'/'should' and do/don't pairing are shown in context.
Optionally surface a minimal acceptance-criteria snippet template to make the accessibility QA checklist executable in code review.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and opinionated: tight bullets for tokens, spacing, rules, and gates with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (explicit token hex values, the full state list 'default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error', 'must'/'should' language, a QA checklist), but it never provides a fully-worked example artifact showing the intended output guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 'Guideline Authoring Workflow' (restate intent → tokens → components → a11y → anti-patterns → QA checklist) gives a clear sequence, and the closing QA checklist plus Quality Gates act as explicit validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained body well under 50 lines, organized into clearly labeled sections with no external bundle files; per the rubric's simple-skill note, this qualifies for full marks. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |